Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10639531›Full record

Trial reportThorax2000

Diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in whole blood: a prospective clinical study.

M L Lorente, M Falguera, A Nogués, A R González, M T Merino, M R Caballero

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of Streptococcus pneumoniae in community-acquired pneumonia among adults in Europe: a meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2011
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Evolving Understanding of the Causes of Pneumonia in Adults, With Special Attention to the Role of Pneumococcus.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Non-culture-based methods to diagnose bloodstream infection: Does it work?European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Legionella pneumophila DNA in serum samples during Legionnaires' disease in relation to C-reactive protein levels.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M L LorenteDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Rovira Roure 80, 25006 Lleida, Spain.
M Falguera
A Nogués
A R González
M T Merino
M R Caballero
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of community acquired pneumonia; however, only a small proportion of cases can be detected by conventional methods. The ability of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test performed on whole blood samples to identify patients with pneumococcal pneumonia was investigated.

methodsOne hundred and fourteen consecutive adult patients with community acquired pneumonia were evaluated by a wide battery of diagnostic tests in order to determine the aetiology. Blood samples from these patients and 50 controls were also tested by the nested PCR test to detect selected pneumolysin gene fragments of S pneumoniae.

resultsThe patients were divided into four groups: (1) 40 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia in 22 of whom (55%) the PCR was positive (eight of 11 with bacteraemia and 14 of 29 without); (2) 30 with pneumonia due to other pathogens in all of whom the PCR was negative; (3) 44 with pneumonia of unknown aetiology in 14 of whom (32%) PCR was positive, and (4) 50 controls in whom the PCR test was positive in two (4%). Thus, the sensitivity of the test was 55% and the specificity 100% (81% if positive PCR tests among undiagnosed patients are considered as false positive results).

conclusionPCR applied to whole blood samples appears to be a sensitive and very specific diagnostic test for identifying patients with pneumococcal pneumonia with a potential application in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, PneumococcalPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID10639531
PMCPMC1745670
OpenAlexW2137867766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.