Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10639162›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

Cationic microparticles: A potent delivery system for DNA vaccines.

M Singh, M Briones, G Ott, D O'Hagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 493 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Emerging Cationic Nanovaccines.Pharmaceutics · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Analysis of Nanoparticle Adjuvant Properties.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cationic Nanostructures for Vaccines Design.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M SinghChiron Vaccines, Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.
M Briones
G Ott
D O'Hagan
Itron (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An approach involving the preparation of biodegradable microparticles with a cationic surface was developed to improve the delivery of adsorbed DNA into antigen-presenting cells after i.m. injection. The microparticles released intact and functional DNA over 2 weeks in vitro. In addition, the microparticles induced higher levels of marker gene expression in vivo. After i.m. immunization, the microparticles induced significantly enhanced serum antibody responses in comparison to naked DNA. Moreover, the level of antibodies induced by the microparticles was significantly enhanced by the addition of a vaccine adjuvant, aluminum phosphate. In addition, in contrast to naked DNA, the cationic microparticles induced potent cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses at a low dose.

Indexed as

MicrospheresAnimalsAntibody FormationCationsCytotoxicity, ImmunologicDNADNA, ViralDrug CarriersDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsGene ExpressionGene Products, gagInjections, IntramuscularLuciferasesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CCationsDNADNA, ViralDrug CarriersGene Products, gagLuciferasesp55 gag precursor protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1Protein PrecursorsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID10639162
PMCPMC15413
OpenAlexW2097738098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.