Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10639143›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein.

J K Grenier, S B Carroll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. National science review · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms of Specificity for Hox Factor Activity.Journal of developmental biology · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The phylotypic stage as a boundary of modular memory: non mechanistic perspective.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2012
    Article
  9. Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Adaptive changes in the transcription factor HoxA-11 are essential for the evolution of pregnancy in mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differential expression patterns of the hox gene are associated with differential growth of insect hind legs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular characterization and mapping of ATOH7, a human atonal homolog with a predicted role in retinal ganglion cell development.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J K GrenierHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, 1525 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
S B Carroll
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hox genes have been implicated as central to the evolution of animal body plan diversity. Regulatory changes both in Hox expression domains and in Hox-regulated gene networks have arisen during the evolution of related taxa, but there is little knowledge of whether functional changes in Hox proteins have also contributed to morphological evolution. For example, the evolution of greater numbers of differentiated segments and body parts in insects, compared with the simpler body plans of arthropod ancestors, may have involved an increase in the spectrum of biochemical interactions of individual Hox proteins. Here, we compare the in vivo functions of orthologous Ultrabithorax (Ubx) proteins from the insect Drosophila melanogaster and from an onychophoran, a member of a sister phylum with a more primitive and homonomous body plan. These Ubx proteins, which have been diverging in sequence for over 540 million years, can generate many of the same gain-of-function tissue transformations and can activate and repress many of the same target genes when expressed during Drosophila development. However, the onychophora Ubx (OUbx) protein does not transform the segmental identity of the embryonic ectoderm or repress the Distal-less target gene. This functional divergence is due to sequence changes outside the conserved homeodomain region. The inability of OUbx to function like Drosophila Ubx (DUbx) in the embryonic ectoderm indicates that the Ubx protein may have acquired new cofactors or activity modifiers since the divergence of the onychophoran and insect lineages.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularTranscription FactorsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsArthropodsBody PatterningDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianExtremitiesFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationHomeodomain ProteinsInsect ProteinsDNA-Binding Proteinsdpp protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsInsect ProteinsTranscription FactorsUbx protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID10639143
PMCPMC15394
OpenAlexW2049717930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.