Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10628992›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

A genetic test to determine the origin of maternal transmission ratio distortion. Meiotic drive at the mouse Om locus.

F Pardo-Manuel de Villena, E de la Casa-Esperon, T L Briscoe, C Sapienza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Meiotic drive of noncentromeric loci in mammalian meiosis II eggs.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Bypassing Mendel's First Law: Transmission Ratio Distortion in Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization of two Mst1-deficient mouse models.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F Pardo-Manuel de VillenaFels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
E de la Casa-Esperon
T L Briscoe
C Sapienza
Temple University · US

Funding

Genetic and Molecular Analysis of DDK SyndromeR01HD034508 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SAPIENZA, CARMEN · 1997 to 2009
$2.9M
TRANSMISSION RATIO DISTORTION FOR GENES ON 2 CHROMOSOMESR01GM052332 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI SAPIENZA, CARMEN · 1995 to 1998
–
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD34508NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM52332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have shown previously that the progeny of crosses between heterozygous females and C57BL/6 males show transmission ratio distortion at the Om locus on mouse chromosome 11. This result has been replicated in several independent experiments. Here we show that the distortion maps to a single locus on chromosome 11, closely linked to Om, and that gene conversion is not implicated in the origin of this phenomenon. To further investigate the origin of the transmission ratio distortion we generated a test using the well-known effect of recombination on maternal meiotic drive. The genetic test presented here discriminates between unequal segregation of alleles during meiosis and lethality, based on the analysis of genotype at both the distorted locus and the centromere of the same chromosome. We used this test to determine the cause of the transmission ratio distortion observed at the Om locus. Our results indicate that transmission ratio distortion at Om is due to unequal segregation of alleles to the polar body at the second meiotic division. Because the presence of segregation distortion at Om also depends on the genotype of the sire, our results confirm that the sperm can influence segregation of maternal chromosomes to the second polar body.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenomic ImprintingAnimalsCrosses, GeneticFemaleGenetic LinkageMeiosisMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BL

Identifiers

PMID10628992
PMCPMC1460926
OpenAlexW1786115620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.