Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10626079›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology1999

Coronary artery blood flow: physiologic and pathophysiologic regulation.

L Feliciano, R J Henning

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L FelicianoDepartment of Medicine, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
R J Henning
Florida College · USJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial ischemia, which results from a significant imbalance between myocardial oxygen demands and myocardial oxygen supply, occurs in as many as six million persons with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease in the United States. Accordingly, a clear understanding of the physiologic and pathophysiologic factors that influence coronary artery blood flow is important to the clinician and provides the basis for the judicious use of medications for the treatment of patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. This review discusses the endothelial, metabolic, myogenic, and neurohumoral mechanisms of coronary blood flow regulation and the interaction of the different mechanisms in the regulation of coronary blood flow. The importance of nitric oxide in coronary blood flow regulation is emphasized. We also discuss the common clinical problems of hyperlipidemia and coronary atherosclerosis, coronary artery spasm, and systemic arterial hypertension that result in coronary artery endothelial dysfunction, the impaired production and increased inactivation of nitric oxide, and impairment in coronary blood flow regulation. This information is important to clinicians because more than forty million people in the United States have atherosclerotic or hypertensive heart disease and therefore are at risk for significant myocardial complications due to impairment of coronary blood flow regulation.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationEndothelium, VascularHumansHypertensionMyocardial IschemiaNitric OxideVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilator AgentsNitric OxideVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID10626079
PMCPMC6656097
OpenAlexW2025987723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.