Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10622013›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1999

Methadone treatment practices and outcome for opiate addicts treated in drug clinics and in general practice: results from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study.

M Gossop, J Marsden, D Stewart, P Lehmann, J Strang

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Interim methadone treatment: impact on arrests.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2009
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Just call it "treatment".Addiction science & clinical practice · 2012
    Article
  10. New approaches to dealing with opioid drug dependence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Dropout from outpatient mental health care in the United States.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Factors affecting willingness to provide buprenorphine treatment.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2009
    Article
  16. Review
  17. [Medical quality circles for drug replacement therapy].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2006
    Article
  18. Methadone vs buprenorphine.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  19. Does methadone maintenance treatment based on the new national guidelines work in a primary care setting?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Article
  20. Experience of heroin overdose among drug users attending general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M GossopNational Addiction Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London.
J Marsden
D Stewart
P Lehmann
J Strang
Maudsley Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) are increasingly urged to become more involved in the care and treatment of drug misusers. Little information is available about the effectiveness of treatments delivered in primary health care or specialist settings. The impact of treatment setting is investigated as part of the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). This is the largest study of treatment outcome for drug misusers ever conducted in the United Kingdom (UK).

aimThis paper presents six-month treatment outcomes for patients who received community-based methadone treatment in either a specialist drug clinic or a general practice setting.

methodA prospective, multisite follow-up study of treatment outcome was conducted with 452 opiate addicts who had been given methadone treatment in primary health care and specialist clinic settings. Outcome data are presented for substance use behaviours, health, and crime.

resultsImprovements at follow-up were found among both the GP and the clinic-treated groups in drug-related problems, health, and social functioning. Problems at intake were broadly comparable among the clinic-based and the GP patients. Similar levels and types of improvement were found for both groups at six-month follow-up.

conclusionsResults demonstrate the feasibility of treating opiate addicts using methadone in primary health care settings, and show that treatment outcomes for such patients can be as satisfactory as for patients in specialist drug clinics. The GPs in our study are unrepresentative in their willingness to be actively involved with problem drug users; moreover, several services treated relatively large numbers of drug users. Issues surrounding the growth of 'GP specialists' are discussed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedNarcoticsOpioid-Related DisordersProspective StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomMethadoneNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID10622013
PMCPMC1313314
OpenAlexW2164997274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.