Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10621995›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1999

Computer support for genetic advice in primary care.

J Emery

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical decision support for genetically guided personalized medicine: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Pooled it
  2. An Assessment of Family History Information Captured in an Electronic Health Record.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J EmeryGeneral Practice Research Group, University of Oxford. jon.emery@green.ox.ac.uk
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are under increasing pressure to advise patients about genetic risk. Secondary care lacks the resources to deal with the increasing number of referrals for genetic counselling, and thus recommendations have been made to develop primary care genetics. But for most GPs, genetics is unfamiliar territory. Computers could help general practice to provide a genetics service by simplifying the construction and assessment of family trees and by implementing management guidelines. No programs have been written specifically for primary care genetics, but a range of software exists for secondary care. This paper discusses the types of program already available and how they relate to the needs of primary care. Currently available software offers only elements of the outlined 'ideal' program for primary care and may be too complex for a general practice setting. Most importantly, none provide decision support concerning management based on the level of risk, even though this may be the most valuable element. Genetics is an appropriate area for decision support software in general practice, but it would be wrong to assume that this alone is the key to developing primary care genetics. Additional educational strategies for GPs will be required, and the attitudes of patients to receiving expert advice from a computer must be considered. Current practice computer systems will have to develop so they can communicate with Windows-based expert systems, and changes in existing surgery hardware may be necessary. Existing genetics software provides a starting point from which to derive an appropriate system for general practice. A carefully developed decision-support system could empower GPs to meet the challenge of offering a high-quality genetics service in primary care.

Indexed as

Decision Making, Computer-AssistedEnglandFamily PracticeGenetic CounselingHumansPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID10621995
PMCPMC1313480
OpenAlexW130345228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.