Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10618195›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2000

Genotyping of Campylobacter spp.

T M Wassenaar, D G Newell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Aerotolerance and Multi-Locus Sequence Typing ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Molecular Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Highly Prevalent Multidrug-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Molecular determination of genetic diversity amongInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Molecular typing of Campylobacter jejuni strains: comparison among four different techniques.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  16. Multidrug-resistantF1000Research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T M WassenaarInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University, D-55101 Mainz, Germany.
D G Newell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesAnimalsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsGenes, BacterialGenotypeHumans

Identifiers

PMID10618195
PMCPMC91777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.