Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10618081›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

Comparison of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and PCR-direct sequencing methods for differentiating Helicobacter pylori ureB gene variants.

T Tanahashi, M Kita, T Kodama, N Sawai, Y Yamaoka, S Mitsufuji, F Katoh, J Imanishi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T TanahashiThird Department of Internal Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. ttana@sun.kpu-m.ac.jp
M Kita
T Kodama
N Sawai
Y Yamaoka
S Mitsufuji
F Katoh
J Imanishi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A method utilizing PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in the Helicobacter pylori genes is widely used to differentiate strains. However, with this typing method only a single base change at a specific restriction site can be detected. In addition, it is unclear whether the nucleotide base change recognized by RFLP is related to a substitution of encoded amino acid. To examine the validity of the PCR-RFLP method, 933-bp PCR products were obtained from 41 different clinical H. pylori isolates and were digested with Sau3A restriction endonuclease. Furthermore, the nucleotides of the same region in the ureB gene were directly sequenced and compared. PCR-RFLP confirmed that there was genetic diversity within the ureB gene with three distinct types, one being well conserved and the other two being variations. However, the direct sequencing method revealed that there was no difference at the nucleotide level among these RFLP types. Base substitutions recognized by Sau3A occurred in the third-base position and did not change the encoded amino acid. In addition, many nucleotide mutations, which could not be recognized by Sau3A, were frequently found. These results suggest that the PCR-RFLP method provides for an easy typing scheme of isolates, but does not reveal the true extent of genetic diversity. It is proposed that careful observation is required for the interpretation of results when clinical isolates are differentiated.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationBase SequenceBiopsyGenes, BacterialHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidUreaseUrease

Identifiers

PMID10618081
PMCPMC86046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.