Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10618068›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

Relationship of incremental specimen volumes and enhanced detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA with nucleic acid amplification technology.

D J Witt, M Kemper, A Stead, C C Ginocchio, A M Caliendo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D J WittOrganon Teknika Corporation, Durham, North Carolina, USA. dwitt@orgtek.com
M Kemper
A Stead
C C Ginocchio
A M Caliendo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between specimen input volume and the frequency of reported human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA copy numbers by nucleic acid amplification technology (the NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT system) was investigated. Results obtained with both clinical specimens and dilution panels indicated that both the absolute number of reported results and the reported HIV-1 RNA copy number were directly proportional to the specimen input volumes evaluated (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 ml). Conversion of the reported HIV-1 RNA copy numbers to a constant 1.0-ml volume indicated that the numerical relationship among the specimen input volumes and the HIV-1 RNA copy numbers was multiplicative. The HIV-1 RNA copy numbers reported for the 0.5-ml input volume were approximately 5-fold increased over those reported for the 0.1-ml input volume, and those reported for the 1.0-ml input volume were 10-fold increased over those reported for the 0.1-ml input volume. For the specimen input volumes investigated, a common linear range of 264 to 5,400,000 HIV-1 RNA copies was observed. The use of increased specimen input volumes did not result in a loss of assay specificity, as the results reported for specimens from 50 seronegative blood donors were negative at all three specimen input volumes. In conclusion, an increase in the input volume of specimens analyzed by nucleic acid amplification technology can be useful for the enhanced detection of HIV-1 RNA.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesViral LoadCD4 Lymphocyte CountHIV InfectionsHumansRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID10618068
PMCPMC86025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.