ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000
Relationship of incremental specimen volumes and enhanced detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA with nucleic acid amplification technology.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in the genital tracts of HCV/HIV-1-coinfected women.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2005Article
- Multicenter evaluation of the performance characteristics of the NucliSens HIV-1 QT assay used for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- Stochastic processes defining sensitivity and variability of internally calibrated quantitative NASBA-based viral load assays.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
- Longitudinal variability of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA viral load measurements by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and NucliSens assays in a large multicenter study.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2001Article
- Multicenter comparison of Roche COBAS AMPLICOR MONITOR version 1.5, Organon Teknika NucliSens QT with Extractor, and Bayer Quantiplex version 3.0 for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between specimen input volume and the frequency of reported human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA copy numbers by nucleic acid amplification technology (the NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT system) was investigated. Results obtained with both clinical specimens and dilution panels indicated that both the absolute number of reported results and the reported HIV-1 RNA copy number were directly proportional to the specimen input volumes evaluated (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 ml). Conversion of the reported HIV-1 RNA copy numbers to a constant 1.0-ml volume indicated that the numerical relationship among the specimen input volumes and the HIV-1 RNA copy numbers was multiplicative. The HIV-1 RNA copy numbers reported for the 0.5-ml input volume were approximately 5-fold increased over those reported for the 0.1-ml input volume, and those reported for the 1.0-ml input volume were 10-fold increased over those reported for the 0.1-ml input volume. For the specimen input volumes investigated, a common linear range of 264 to 5,400,000 HIV-1 RNA copies was observed. The use of increased specimen input volumes did not result in a loss of assay specificity, as the results reported for specimens from 50 seronegative blood donors were negative at all three specimen input volumes. In conclusion, an increase in the input volume of specimens analyzed by nucleic acid amplification technology can be useful for the enhanced detection of HIV-1 RNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.