Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10617534›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research.

N Mays, C Pope

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04007419 (Promotoras de Donación), which is not on this map. Cited by 1,035 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,035citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04007419 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Promotoras de Donación: Leveraging Community Health Workers to Increase Donor Registration of Older Hispanics

TypeinterventionalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled621ConditionsOrgan Donation, Donor Designation/RegistrationArmsHealth Promoters and Organ Donation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,035 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

975 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

N MaysSocial Policy Branch, The Treasury, PO Box 3724, Wellington, New Zealand. nicholas.mays@treasury.govt.nz
C Pope

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareData CollectionEvaluation Studies as TopicGuidelines as TopicResearch

Identifiers

PMID10617534
PMCPMC1117321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.