ReviewEuropean journal of epidemiology1999
Investigation of clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes, an overview.
Review in European journal of epidemiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cancer cluster investigations: review of the past and proposals for the future.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes are reported with increasing frequency to public health services, but it is likely that only a minority of clusters are caused by a common environmental teratogen or mutagen. Many guidelines and protocols have been developed for the investigation and the management of chronic disease clusters and can be applied to the study of adverse reproductive outcomes. Cluster investigation normally follows four successive phases: (i) the generation of one or more etiologic hypotheses, (ii) the confirmation of the hypotheses, (iii) an intervention aimed at reducing any dangerous exposure, and (iv) the evaluation of the effect of the intervention. However, each situation is unique and there is no standard recipe for conducting the epidemiologic investigation at each successive phase, for choosing the appropriate statistical technique and for communicating with interested parties. In order to minimize both the risk of pursuing a worthless investigation and the risk of ignoring a real excess of cases caused by an adverse environmental factor, it is imperative to rely on a team of specialists with expertise in epidemiology, statistics, toxicology, embryology, and communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10608368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.