Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10608021›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis1995

Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study: Rationale and Design of the CARS Study.

Vorchheimer, Fuster

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

VorchheimerThe Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.
Fuster
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USMount Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction remains the leading cause of death in the United States. Following increased recognition of the role of thrombosis in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction, both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy have been proven effective in preventing recurrent infarction. However, the optimal antithrombotic regimen remains undetermined. In particular, the role of combination antithrombotic therapy has not been studied. The Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study (CARS) will compare the safety and efficacy of fixed-dose combination Coumadin plus aspirin versus aspirin alone among 8000 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Patients will be followed for up to 4 years. CARS will provide important information regarding the optimal antithrombotic regimen for myocardial infarct survivors.

Identifiers

PMID10608021
OpenAlexW2057776012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.