Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10606811›Full record

ArticleMutation research1999

A phylogenomic study of DNA repair genes, proteins, and processes.

J A Eisen, P C Hanawalt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
38.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 468 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Simultaneous multiplex genome loci editing ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  11. Oxidative Stress Induced by Cortisol in Human Platelets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Shifts in mutation spectra enhance access to beneficial mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J A EisenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA. jeisen@tigr.org
P C Hanawalt
Stanford University · US

Funding

Role of transcription in genomic stabilityR01CA077712 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HANAWALT, PHILIP COURTLAND · 1998 to 2016
$5.6M
CELULAR PROCESSING OF DAMAGED DNA--ROLE IN ONCOGENESISR35CA044349 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HANAWALT, PHILIP C · 1987 to 2000
$959k
NCI NIH HHS CA44349NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077712NCI NIH HHS R35 CA044349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to recognize and repair abnormal DNA structures is common to all forms of life. Studies in a variety of species have identified an incredible diversity of DNA repair pathways. Documenting and characterizing the similarities and differences in repair between species has important value for understanding the origin and evolution of repair pathways as well as for improving our understanding of phenotypes affected by repair (e.g., mutation rates, lifespan, tumorigenesis, survival in extreme environments). Unfortunately, while repair processes have been studied in quite a few species, the ecological and evolutionary diversity of such studies has been limited. Complete genome sequences can provide potential sources of new information about repair in different species. In this paper, we present a global comparative analysis of DNA repair proteins and processes based upon the analysis of available complete genome sequences. We use a new form of analysis that combines genome sequence information and phylogenetic studies into a composite analysis we refer to as phylogenomics. We use this phylogenomic analysis to study the evolution of repair proteins and processes and to predict the repair phenotypes of those species for which we now know the complete genome sequence.

Indexed as

DNA GlycosylasesDNA HelicasesEscherichia coli ProteinsGenes, BacterialIntegrasesPhylogenyAdenosine TriphosphatasesAlkylationBacterial ProteinsBase Pair MismatchDeoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidine Dimer)DeoxyribonucleasesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA-Formamidopyrimidine GlycosylaseAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsDeoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidine Dimer)DeoxyribonucleasesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Formamidopyrimidine GlycosylaseDNA GlycosylasesDNA HelicasesDNA LigasesDNA NucleotidyltransferasesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coli Proteinsexodeoxyribonuclease IExodeoxyribonucleasesExodeoxyribonuclease VExonucleasesIntegrasesintegron integrase IntI1LexA Repressor ProteinmutY adenine glycosylaseN-Glycosyl HydrolasesNTH protein, E coliRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinrecE protein, E colirecF protein, BacteriarecF protein, E coliRecombinasesSbcC protein, BacteriaSbcC protein, E colisbcD protein, E coliSerine EndopeptidasesUracil-DNA GlycosidaseUvrA protein, E coliUvrB protein, E coliUvrC protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID10606811
PMCPMC3158673
OpenAlexW1490937614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.