Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10605404›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1999

Clinicopathological features of serrated adenoma of the colorectum: comparison with traditional adenoma.

T Matsumoto, M Mizuno, M Shimizu, T Manabe, M Iida

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Expression of gastric pyloric mucin, MUC6, in colorectal serrated polyps.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2010
    Article
  6. Clinico-pathological aspects of colorectal serrated adenomas.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T MatsumotoDepartment of Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
M Mizuno
M Shimizu
T Manabe
M Iida
Kawasaki Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSerrated adenoma is a recently described category of colorectal adenoma. The aim of this study was to determine whether serrated adenomas have clinicopathological findings distinct from "traditional" adenoma.

methodsColonoscopy records for 1995-1998 were reviewed, and all traditional adenomas and serrated adenomas identified. Tumour site and endoscopic configuration were compared between the two types of adenoma. In polypectomised lesions, size and grade of dysplasia were compared between the two groups.

resultsThere were 3305 traditional adenomas and 43 serrated adenomas. Serrated adenomas were more often found in the rectosigmoid colon than the traditional adenomas (67.5% v 41.2%, p = 0.0008). Polypectomy was more often done for serrated adenomas (27 of 43 lesions, 62.8%) than for traditional adenomas (626 of 3305 lesions, 18.9%, p < 0.0001). Size (mean (SD) maximum dimension, 12 (6) mm v 13 (3) mm) and incidence of high grade dysplasia (14.8% v 13.6%) in endoscopically removed specimens were not different between the two types.

conclusionsThe therapeutic judgement applied to the management of traditional adenoma seems to be appropriate for serrated adenoma.

Indexed as

AdenomaChi-Square DistributionColonic NeoplasmsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID10605404
PMCPMC501493
OpenAlexW2151245463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.