Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10603733›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)1999

[Therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma].

M Böhmig, B Wiedenmann, S Rosewicz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M BöhmigMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
B Wiedenmann
S Rosewicz
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant advances in the areas of epidemiology, risk factors, molecular genetics and diagnosis pancreatic carcinoma is characterized by a dismal prognosis and ranks 5th among malignancy-associated deaths. This article attempts to critically review the current literature and analyze therapeutic recommendations based on published evidence. Therapeutic options are based on the stage of the disease. SURGICAL TREATMENT: Surgical resection with curative intention is feasible only in a minority of patients presenting with locally confined tumor disease. RADIO- AND CHEMOTHERAPY: Adjuvant combined radiochemotherapy might potentially improve survival and can also be considered in unresectable, locally advanced disease. The role of chemotherapy in advanced disease is exclusively palliative. Up to now, no chemotherapeutic regimen has demonstrated convincing impact on survival. Newer substances, such as gemcitabine, appear to be of some value in respect to quality of life. Best supportive care oriented at clinical symptoms remains a cornerstone in the therapeutic concept of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

conclusionDevelopment of innovative therapeutic strategies is therefore mandatory.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPalliative CarePancreatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID10603733
OpenAlexW106427042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.