Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10603622›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences1999

Therapeutic strategies in multiple sclerosis. II. Long-term repair.

N Scolding

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

N ScoldingDepartment of Neurology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous myelin repair in multiple sclerosis (MS) provides a striking example of the brain's inherent capacity for sustained and stable regenerative tissue repair--but also clearly emphasizes the limitations of this capacity; remyelination ultimately fails widely in many patients, and disability and handicap accumulate. The observation of endogenous partial myelin repair has raised the possibility that therapeutic interventions designed to supplement or promote remyelination might have a useful and significant impact both in the short term, in restoring conduction, and in the long term, in safeguarding axons. Therapeutic remyelination interventions must involve manipulations to either the molecular or the cellular environment within lesions; both depend crucially on a detailed understanding of the biology of the repair process and of those glia implicated in spontaneous repair, or capable of contributing to exogenous repair. Here we explore the biology of myelin repair in MS, examining the glia responsible for successful remyelination, oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells, their 'target' cells, neurons and the roles of astrocytes. Options for therapeutic remyelinating strategies are reviewed, including glial cell transplantation and treatment with growth factors or other soluble molecules. Clinical aspects of remyelination therapies are considered--which patients, which lesions, which stage of the disease, and how to monitor an intervention--and the remaining obstacles and hazards to these approaches are discussed.

Indexed as

AstrocytesGrowth SubstancesHumansImmunization, PassiveMultiple SclerosisMyelin SheathNerve RegenerationNeurogliaNeuronsTime FactorsGrowth Substances

Identifiers

PMID10603622
PMCPMC1692681
OpenAlexW2116798070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.