Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10603388›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2000

Involvement of CD4(+) Th1 cells in systemic immunity protective against primary and secondary challenges with Trypanosoma cruzi.

D F Hoft, A R Schnapp, C S Eickhoff, S T Roodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chagas disease: host responses, parasite evasion and vaccine advances.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2026
    Review
  3. An Update on Vaccines AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aplastic Anemia and Chagas Disease:Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Use ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Blockade of Interleukin-2 During the Acute Phase ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Lessons Learned for Pathogenesis, Immunology, and Disease of Erythrocytic Parasites:Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D F HoftDepartments of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. hoftdf@slu.edu
A R Schnapp
C S Eickhoff
S T Roodman
Saint Louis University · US

Funding

TRYPANOSOMA CRUZI SPECIFIC INDUCTION OF IFN GAMMAR29AI034912 · NIAID · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI HOFT, DANIEL F. · 1994 to 1998
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI34912-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In general, gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)-producing CD4(+) Th1 cells are important for the immunological control of intracellular pathogens. We previously demonstrated an association between parasite-specific induction of IFN-gamma responses and resistance to the intracellular protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi. To investigate a potential causal relationship between Th1 responses and T. cruzi resistance, we studied the ability of Th1 cells to protect susceptible BALB/c mice against virulent parasite challenges. We developed immunization protocols capable of inducing polarized Th1 and Th2 responses in vivo. Induction of parasite-specific Th1 responses, but not Th2 responses, protected BALB/c mice against virulent T. cruzi challenges. We generated T. cruzi-specific CD4(+) Th1 and Th2 cell lines from BALB/c mice that were activated by infected macrophages to produce their corresponding cytokine response profiles. Th1 cells, but not Th2 cells, induced nitric oxide production and inhibited intracellular parasite replication in T. cruzi-infected macrophages. Despite the ability to inhibit parasite replication in vitro, Th1 cells alone could not adoptively transfer protection against T. cruzi to SCID mice. In addition, despite the fact that the adoptive transfer of CD4(+) T lymphocytes was shown to be necessary for the development of immunity protective against primary T. cruzi infection in our SCID mouse model, protective secondary effector functions could be transferred to SCID mice from memory-immune BALB/c mice in the absence of CD4(+) T lymphocytes. These results indicate that, although CD4(+) Th1 cells can directly inhibit intracellular parasite replication, a more important role for these cells in T. cruzi systemic immunity may be to provide helper activity for the development of other effector functions protective in vivo.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAnimalsCell LineChagas DiseaseCytokinesFemaleImmunizationImmunologic MemoryIn Vitro TechniquesLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, SCIDNitric OxideTh1 CellsTh2 CellsCytokinesNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID10603388
PMCPMC97121
OpenAlexW2071583406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.