Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10602757›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

In vitro activities of the new antifungal triazole SCH 56592 against common and emerging yeast pathogens.

F Barchiesi, D Arzeni, A W Fothergill, L F Di Francesco, F Caselli, M G Rinaldi, G Scalise

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 3-Benzyl-sulfanyl-5-(4-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-ylmeth-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-amine.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F BarchiesiIstituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Ancona, Ancona, Italy. cmalinf@popsci.unian.it
D Arzeni
A W Fothergill
L F Di Francesco
F Caselli
M G Rinaldi
G Scalise
Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A broth microdilution method performed in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines was used to compare the in vitro activity of the new antifungal triazole SCH 56592 (SCH) to that of fluconazole (FLC), itraconazole (ITC), and ketoconazole (KETO) against 257 clinical yeast isolates. They included 220 isolates belonging to 12 different species of Candida, 15 isolates each of Cryptococcus neoformans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and seven isolates of Rhodotorula rubra. The MICs of SCH at which 50% (MIC(50)) and 90% (MIC(90)) of the isolates were inhibited were 0.06 and 2.0 microg/ml, respectively. In general, SCH was considerably more active than FLC (MIC(50) and MIC(90) of 1.0 and 64 microg/ml, respectively) and slightly more active than either ITC (MIC(50) and MIC(90) of 0.25 and 2.0 microg/ml, respectively) and KETO (MIC(50) and MIC(90) of 0.125 and 4.0 microg/ml, respectively). Our in vitro data suggest that SCH has significant potential for clinical development.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTriazolesYeastsAntifungal AgentsposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID10602757
PMCPMC89662
OpenAlexW2110172220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.