Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10602727›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

Zanamivir susceptibility monitoring and characterization of influenza virus clinical isolates obtained during phase II clinical efficacy studies.

J M Barnett, A Cadman, D Gor, M Dempsey, M Walters, A Candlin, M Tisdale, P J Morley, I J Owens, R J Fenton and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Design and performance testing of quantitative real time PCR assays for influenza A and B viral load measurement.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2004
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Selective incorporation of influenza virus RNA segments into virions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J M BarnettClinical Virology Unit, Glaxo Wellcome Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
A Cadman
D Gor
M Dempsey
M Walters
A Candlin
M Tisdale
P J Morley
I J Owens
R J Fenton
A P Lewis
E C Claas
G F Rimmelzwaan
R De Groot
A D Osterhaus
Center for Systems Biology · USAge UK · GBChildren's Hospital Agia Sophia · GRErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zanamivir is a highly selective neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor with demonstrated clinical efficacy against influenza A and B virus infections. In phase II clinical efficacy trials (NAIB2005 and NAIB2008), virological substudies showed mean reductions in virus shedding after 24 h of treatment of 1.5 to 2.0 log(10) 50% tissue culture infective doses compared to a placebo, with no reemergence of virus after the completion of therapy. Paired isolates (n = 41) obtained before and during therapy with zanamivir demonstrated no shifts in susceptibility to zanamivir when measured by NA assays, although for a few isolates NA activity was too low to evaluate. In plaque reduction assays in MDCK cells, the susceptibility of isolates to zanamivir was extremely variable even at baseline and did not correlate with the speed of resolution of virus shedding. Isolates with apparent limited susceptibility to zanamivir by plaque reduction proved highly susceptible in vivo in the ferret model. Further sequence analysis of paired isolates revealed no changes in the hemagglutinin and NA genes in the majority of isolates. The few changes observed were all natural variants. No amino acid changes that had previously been identified in vitro as being involved with reduced susceptibility to zanamivir were observed. These studies highlighted problems associated with monitoring susceptibility to NA inhibitors in the clinic, in that no reliable cell-based assay is available. At present the NA assay is the best available predictor of susceptibility to NA inhibitors in vivo, as measured in the validated ferret model of infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCells, CulturedDogsEnzyme InhibitorsFerretsGuanidinesHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeuraminidaseOrthomyxoviridaePyransSialic AcidsZanamivirAntiviral AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsGuanidinesHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusNeuraminidasePyransSialic AcidsZanamivir

Identifiers

PMID10602727
PMCPMC89632
OpenAlexW2066429701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.