ReviewDrugs & aging1999
Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a comparative review.
Review in Drugs & aging, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Background to and management of treatment-related bone loss in prostate cancer.Drugs & aging · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimising lifestyle and diet are important in the management of osteoporosis, however, they cannot completely prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Calcium supplementation significantly retards but does not completely arrest bone loss, but several small controlled studies suggest that it reduces fracture incidence. Thiazide diuretics slow bone loss similarly but their effects on fracture incidence remain to be determined. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) increases or maintains bone density, prevents height loss and prevents vertebral fractures. There is observational evidence that HRT decreases cardiovascular disease and increases the risks of thromboembolic disease and breast cancer. The selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene also slows postmenopausal bone loss although it is less effective that HRT. It also increases the risk of thromboembolic disease but is associated with a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer. The bisphosphonates are of comparable efficacy to HRT in the prevention of bone loss and have been shown to halve the risk of fractures of the vertebrae, forearm and hip. The maintenance of normal vitamin D (colecalciferol) status is important, particularly in the elderly. HRT, the bisphosphonates and raloxifene are all suitable for use in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, but the former 2 are to be preferred in the treatment of established disease. The most comprehensive long term safety data are available for HRT. Clinical trials are underway at present with more potent bisphosphonates which may make possible longer dose intervals and alternative routes of administration. There is a need for an effective bone anabolic factor but those which have been trialled to date have not proceeded because of significant adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.