Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10599569›Full record

ArticleTobacco control1999

The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours.

A J Farkas, E A Gilpin, J M Distefan, J P Pierce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A pilot randomized study of smokeless tobacco use among smokers not interested in quitting: changes in smoking behavior and readiness to quit.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2010
    Trial
  6. Parent quit attempts after counseling to reduce children's secondhand smoke exposure and promote cessation: main and moderating relationships.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2009
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spontaneous Smoking Cessation in Parents.Journal of smoking cessation · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A J FarkasCancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0645, USA. afarkas@ucsd.edu
E A Gilpin
J M Distefan
J P Pierce

Funding

IMPACT OF WORKSITE AND HOUSEHOLD SMOKING RETRICTIONSR01CA068335 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI FARKAS, ARTHUR J · 1995 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA 68335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the association of household and workplace smoking restrictions with quit attempts, six month cessation, and light smoking.

designLogistic regressions identified the association of household and workplace smoking restrictions with attempts to quit, six month cessation, and light smoking.

settingLarge population surveys, United States. SUBJECTS: Respondents (n = 48,584) smoked during the year before interview in 1992-1993, lived with at least one other person, and were either current daily smokers or were former smokers when interviewed.

main outcome measuresThe outcome measures were an attempt to quit during the last 12 months, cessation for at least six months among those who made an attempt to quit, and light smoking (< 15 cigarettes a day).

resultsSmokers who lived (odds ratio (OR) = 3.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.57 to 4.18) or worked (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.24) under a total smoking ban were more likely to report a quit attempt in the previous year. Among those who made an attempt, those who lived (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.43 to 1.91) or worked (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.003 to 1.45) under a total smoking ban were more likely to be in cessation for at least six months. Current daily smokers who lived (OR = 2.73, 95% CI = 2.46 to 3.04) or worked (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.38 to 1.70) under a total smoking ban were more likely to be light smokers.

conclusionsBoth workplace and household smoking restrictions were associated with higher rates of cessation attempts, lower rates of relapse in smokers who attempt to quit, and higher rates of light smoking among current daily smokers.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionWorkplaceAdolescentAdultAgedFamilyHumansMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceSmoking CessationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID10599569
PMCPMC1763963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.