ArticleInternational journal of cardiac imaging1999
Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections.
Article in International journal of cardiac imaging, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
- Article
- Impact of the bifurcation angle on major cardiac events after cross-over single stent strategy in unprotected left main bifurcation lesions: 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2014Article
- Coronary artery distensibility assessed by 3.0 Tesla coronary magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with and without coronary artery disease.The American journal of cardiology · 2011Article
- Rui Liao's work on patient-specific 3-D model guidance for interventional and hybrid-operating-room applications.World journal of radiology · 2011Article
- Novel QCA methodologies and angiographic scores.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2011Review
- 3-D reconstruction of the coronary artery tree from multiple views of a rotational X-ray angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2010Article
- In-vivo coronary flow profiling based on biplane angiograms: influence of geometric simplifications on the three-dimensional reconstruction and wall shear stress calculation.Biomedical engineering online · 2006Article
- Effects of point configuration on the accuracy in 3D reconstruction from biplane images.Medical physics · 2005Article
- Three-dimensional analysis of in vivo coronary stent--coronary artery interactions.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2004Article
- Three-dimensional motion tracking of coronary arteries in biplane cineangiograms.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2003Article
- 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients.International journal of cardiac imaging · 2000Article
- A system for determination of 3D vessel tree centerlines from biplane images.International journal of cardiac imaging · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe goal of the study was the validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections.
methodsThe accuracy was tested in a complex phantom. In vivo, inter- and intraobserver agreement were assessed by analysis of routine angiograms. The sensitivity was evaluated using angiograms of patients having diagnostic vasoactive pharmacological intervention. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (2-D QCA) and 3-D QCA were compared concerning the accuracy of diameter evaluation.
results3-D QCA yields accurate results (< 3% error) even based on nonorthogonal views, provided that projections parallel to the object are avoided. The inter- and intraobserver variability is < or = 5%. Significant (p < 0.01) changes of the volume (36-39%) and the diameter (19-21%) are detected following pharmacological intervention. 2-D QCA and 3-D QCA agree in short matched segments without foreshortening. 2-D QCA is rather sensitive to foreshortening and not suitable for evaluation of diameters of longer branches or total coronaries.
conclusion3-D QCA permits an accurate, reproducible and sensitive comprehensive three-dimensional geometric analysis of the coronaries and is superior to 2-D QCA with respect to extended diameter evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10595401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.