Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1999
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for fantofarone cardiac and brachial haemodynamic effects in healthy volunteers.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for perindoprilat regional haemodynamic effects in healthy volunteers and in congestive heart failure patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2001Trial
- [3 + 2]-Annulation of pyridinium ylides with 1-chloro-2-nitrostyrenes unveils a tubulin polymerization inhibitor.Organic & biomolecular chemistry · 2021Article
- Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2014Article
- Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of the effects of nicorandil in the treatment of acute heart failure.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the pharmacokinetics of SR 33671, the main active metabolite of the calcium antagonist fantofarone, and the relationships between its concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects after a single oral administration of two doses (100 and 300 mg) of fantofarone.
methodsA placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind and crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers. SR 33671 plasma concentrations (C, ng ml-1 ) and effects (E) on heart rate (HR, beats min-1 ), PR interval duration (ms), brachial artery flow (BAF, ml min-1 ) and brachial vascular resistance (BVR, mmHg s ml-1 ) were determined repeatedly after drug intake. Haemodynamic effects were expressed as percent changes from initial values. Bi-exponential (pharmacokinetics), and linear [E=S.C+E0, for cardiac effects] or sigmoid [E=Emax.Cgamma/(CEgamma50+Cgamma ), for haemodynamic effects] models were fitted to individual data.
resultsPeak plasma concentrations and areas under the curve up to 24 h were (mean+/-s.d.) 16+/-10 ng ml-1 and 157.50+/-89.13 ng ml-1 h, and 63+/-11 ng ml-1 and 535.50+/-135.11 ng ml-1 h, after 100 and 300 mg, respectively. Terminal half-life was approximately 4 h. For pharmacodynamics, we obtained: S=-0.201+/-0.057 beats min-1/ng ml-1 for HR, S=0.526+/-0.114 ms/ng ml-1 for PR interval duration, Emax=42+/-6%, CE50=8.8+/-7.2 ng ml-1 and gamma=2.2+/-1.5 for BAF, and Emax=-28+/-4%, CE50=5.8+/-5.1 ng ml-1 and gamma=3.4+/-1.8 for BVR. At a SR 33671 concentration of 15 ng ml-1, BVR is decreased by 27% whereas HR is reduced by less than 3 beats min-1 and PR interval duration is increased by less than 8 ms.
conclusionsFantofarone is able to induce submaximal peripheral vasodilating effects at doses that are devoid of any clinically significant cardiac effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.