Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10594055›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience1999

Blue- and green-absorbing visual pigments of Drosophila: ectopic expression and physiological characterization of the R8 photoreceptor cell-specific Rh5 and Rh6 rhodopsins.

E Salcedo, A Huber, S Henrich, L V Chadwell, W H Chou, R Paulsen, S G Britt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Horizontal-cell like Dm9 neurons inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Role of Reversible Phosphorylation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Molecular advances to study the function, evolution and spectral tuning of arthropod visual opsins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E SalcedoInstitute of Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78245, USA.
A Huber
S Henrich
L V Chadwell
W H Chou
R Paulsen
S G Britt
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF RHODOPSIN SENSITIVITYR01EY010759 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI BRITT, STEVEN G · 1995 to 2002
$815k
NEI NIH HHS R01EY10759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Color discrimination requires the input of different photoreceptor cells that are sensitive to different wavelengths of light. The Drosophila visual system contains multiple classes of photoreceptor cells that differ in anatomical location, synaptic connections, and spectral sensitivity. The Rh5 and Rh6 opsins are expressed in nonoverlapping sets of R8 cells and are the only Drosophila visual pigments that remain uncharacterized. In this study, we ectopically expressed Rh5 and Rh6 in the major class of photoreceptor cells (R1-R6) and show them to be biologically active in their new environment. The expression of either Rh5 or Rh6 in "blind" ninaE(17) mutant flies, which lack the gene encoding the visual pigment of the R1-R6 cells, fully rescues the light response. Electrophysiological analysis showed that the maximal spectral sensitivity of the R1-R6 cells is shifted to 437 or 508 nm when Rh5 or Rh6, respectively, is expressed in these cells. These spectral sensitivities are in excellent agreement with intracellular recordings of the R8p and R8y cells measured in Calliphora and Musca. Spectrophotometric analyses of Rh5 and Rh6 in vivo by microspectrophotometry, and of detergent-extracted pigments in vitro, showed that Rh5 is reversibly photoconverted to a stable metarhodopsin (lambda(max) = 494 nm), whereas Rh6 appears to be photoconverted to a metarhodopsin (lambda(max) = 468 nm) that is less thermally stable. Phylogenetically, Rh5 belongs to a group of short-wavelength-absorbing invertebrate visual pigments, whereas Rh6 is related to a group of long-wavelength-absorbing pigments and is the first member of this class to be functionally characterized.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedColor PerceptionDrosophila melanogasterInvertebratesPhotochemistryPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebratePhylogenyRetinal PigmentsRhodopsinSpectrum AnalysisRetinal PigmentsRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID10594055
PMCPMC6784940
OpenAlexW1919843837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.