ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2000
A double-strand break in a chromosomal LINE element can be repaired by gene conversion with various endogenous LINE elements in mouse cells.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulation of Error-Prone DNA Double-Strand Break Repair and Its Impact on Genome Evolution.Cells · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
- Competitive repair by naturally dispersed repetitive DNA during non-allelic homologous recombination.PLoS genetics · 2010Article
- Frequent gene conversion events between the X and Y homologous chromosomal regions in primates.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- Genome destabilization by homologous recombination in the germ line.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2010Review
- Loss of epigenetic silencing in tumors preferentially affects primate-specific retroelements.Gene · 2009Article
- LINE-1 methylation status of endogenous DNA double-strand breaks.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Computational and biological inference of gene regulatory networks of the LINE-1 retrotransposon.Genomics · 2007Article
- Inviting instability: Transposable elements, double-strand breaks, and the maintenance of genome integrity.Mutation research · 2007Review
- Endonuclease-independent insertion provides an alternative pathway for L1 retrotransposition in the human genome.Nucleic acids research · 2007Article
- Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.Molecular and cellular biology · 2006Article
- Dynamic structure of the SPANX gene cluster mapped to the prostate cancer susceptibility locus HPCX at Xq27.Genome research · 2005Article
- Rad51 overexpression promotes alternative double-strand break repair pathways and genome instability.Oncogene · 2004Article
- Preferential accessibility to specific genomic loci for the repair of double-strand breaks in human cells.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
- Playing in the mud-using gene expression to assess contaminant effects on sediment dwelling invertebrates.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2003Article
- Illegitimate DNA integration in mammalian cells.Gene therapy · 2003Review
- Article
- A chromosomal position effect on gene targeting in human cells.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
- A comprehensive analysis of recently integrated human Ta L1 elements.American journal of human genetics · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A double-strand break (DSB) in the mammalian genome has been shown to be a very potent signal for the cell to activate repair processes. Two different types of repair have been identified in mammalian cells. Broken ends can be rejoined with or without loss or addition of DNA or, alternatively, a homologous template can be used to repair the break. For most genomic sequences the latter event would involve allelic sequences present on the sister chromatid or homologous chromosome. However, since more than 30% of our genome consists of repetitive sequences, these would have the option of using nonallelic sequences for homologous repair. This could have an impact on the evolution of these sequences and of the genome itself. We have designed an assay to look at the repair of DSBs in LINE-1 (L1) elements which number 10(5) copies distributed throughout the genome of all mammals. We introduced into the genome of mouse epithelial cells an L1 element with an I-SceI endonuclease site. We induced DSBs at the I-SceI site and determined their mechanism of repair. We found that in over 95% of cases, the DSBs were repaired by an end-joining process. However, in almost 1% of cases, we found strong evidence for repair involving gene conversion with various endogenous L1 elements, with some being used preferentially. In particular, the T(F) family and the L1Md-A2 subfamily, which are the most active in retrotransposition, appeared to be contributing the most in this process. The degree of homology did not seem to be a determining factor in the selection of the endogenous elements used for repair but may be based instead on accessibility. Considering their abundance and dispersion, gene conversion between repetitive elements may be occurring frequently enough to be playing a role in their evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.