ArticleNucleic acids research2000
ProClass protein family database.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- JACOP: a simple and robust method for the automated classification of protein sequences with modular architecture.BMC bioinformatics · 2005Article
- eBLOCKs: enumerating conserved protein blocks to achieve maximal sensitivity and specificity.Nucleic acids research · 2005Article
- The Protein Information Resource: an integrated public resource of functional annotation of proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
- Tools and resources for identifying protein families, domains and motifs.Genome biology · 2002Review
- Protein Information Resource: a community resource for expert annotation of protein data.Nucleic acids research · 2001Article
- iProClass: an integrated, comprehensive and annotated protein classification database.Nucleic acids research · 2001Article
- The MetaFam Server: a comprehensive protein family resource.Nucleic acids research · 2001Article
- The protein information resource (PIR).Nucleic acids research · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ProClass is a protein family database that organizes non-redundant sequence entries into families defined collectively by PIR superfamilies and PROSITE patterns. By combining global similarities and functional motifs into a single classification scheme, ProClass helps to reveal domain and family relationships and classify multi-domain proteins. The database currently consists of >155 000 sequence entries retrieved from both PIR-International and SWISS-PROT databases. Approximately 92 000 or 60% of the ProClass entries are classified into approximately 6000 families, including a large number of new members detected by our GeneFIND family identification system. The ProClass motif collection contains approximately 72 000 motif sequences and >1300 multiple alignments for all PROSITE patterns, including >21 000 matches not listed in PROSITE and mostly detected from unique PIR sequences. To maximize family information retrieval, the database provides links to various protein family, domain, alignment and structural class databases. With its high classification rate and comprehensive family relationships, ProClass can be used to support full-scale genomic annotation. The database, now being implemented in an object-relational database management system, is available for online sequence search and record retrieval from our WWW server at http://pir.georgetown.edu/gfserver/proclass.html
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.