Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10592172›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2000

DNA data bank of Japan (DDBJ) in collaboration with mass sequencing teams.

Y Tateno, S Miyazaki, M Ota, H Sugawara, T Gojobori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DevMouse, the mouse developmental methylome database and analysis tools.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database.Nucleic acids research · 2002
    Article
  9. GenBank.Nucleic acids research · 2002
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. EBI databases and services.Molecular biotechnology · 2001
    Review
  15. The RDP-II (Ribosomal Database Project).Nucleic acids research · 2001
    Article
  16. GOBASE: the organelle genome database.Nucleic acids research · 2001
    Article
  17. The Mouse Gene Expression Database (GXD).Nucleic acids research · 2001
    Article
  18. The EMBL nucleotide sequence database.Nucleic acids research · 2001
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Y TatenoCenter for Information Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Yata, Mishima 411-8540, Japan. ytateno@genes.nig.ac.jp
S Miyazaki
M Ota
H Sugawara
T Gojobori

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We at DDBJ (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp) process and publicise the massive amounts of data submitted mainly by Japanese genome projects and sequencing teams. It is emphasised that the collaboration between data producing teams and the data bank is crucial in carrying out these processes smoothly. The amount of data submitted in 1999 is so large that it alone exceeds the total amount submitted in the preceding 10 years. To cope with this situation, we have developed tools not only for processing such massive amounts of data but also for efficiently retrieving data on demand.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDNAGenomeHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalJapanMiceDNA

Identifiers

PMID10592172
PMCPMC102400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.