Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10591720›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

Economic evaluation of hospital at home versus hospital care: cost minimisation analysis of data from randomised controlled trial.

J Jones, A Wilson, H Parker, A Wynn, C Jagger, N Spiers, G Parker

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Admission avoidance hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. The Cost-Effectiveness of Homecare Services for Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Pooled it
  8. Admission avoidance hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Admission avoidance hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Review
  16. Home management of acute medical complications in cancer patients: a prospective pilot study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Intermediate care for older people in the U.K.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2010
    Article
  19. Home-based intermediate care program vs hospitalization: Cost comparison study.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
  20. Optimizing economic outcomes in the management of COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J JonesNuffield Community Care Studies Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP.
A Wilson
H Parker
A Wynn
C Jagger
N Spiers
G Parker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the costs of admission to a hospital at home scheme with those of acute hospital admission.

designCost minimisation analysis within a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

settingHospital at home scheme in Leicester and the city's three acute hospitals.

participants199 consecutive patients assessed as being suitable for admission to hospital at home for acute care during the 18 month trial period (median age 84 years).

interventionHospital at home or hospital inpatient care.

main outcome measuresCosts to NHS, social services, patients, and families during the initial episode of treatment and the three months after admission.

resultsMean (median) costs per episode (including any transfer from hospital at home to hospital) were similar when analysed by intention to treat-hospital at home 2569 pounds sterling (1655 pounds sterling), hospital ward 2881 pounds sterling (2031 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -305 (95% confidence interval -1112 to 448). When analysis was restricted to those who accepted their allocated place of care, hospital at home was significantly cheaper-hospital at home 2557 pounds sterling(1710 pounds sterling), hospital ward 3660 pounds sterling (2903 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -1071 (-1843 to -246). At three months the cost differences were sustained. Costs with all cases included were hospital at home 3671 pounds sterling (2491 pounds sterling), hospital ward 3877 pounds sterling (3405 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -210 (-1025 to 635). When only those accepting allocated care were included the costs were hospital at home 3698 pounds sterling (2493 pounds sterling), hospital ward 4761 pounds sterling (3940 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -1063 (-2044 to -163); P=0.009. About 25% of the costs for episodes of hospital at home were incurred through transfer to hospital. Costs per day of care were higher in the hospital at home arm (mean 207 pounds sterling v 134 pounds sterling in the hospital arm, excluding refusers, P<0.001).

conclusionsHospital at home can deliver care at similar or lower cost than an equivalent admission to an acute hospital.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCost of IllnessEnglandFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ResourcesHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHospital CostsHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID10591720
PMCPMC28300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.