Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10591414›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research1999

Amyloid beta peptide membrane perturbation is the basis for its biological effects.

J N Kanfer, G Sorrentino, D S Sitar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J N KanferDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
G Sorrentino
D S Sitar
University of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental studies have indicated that the mechanisms offered for explaining the neurotoxicity of amyloid beta peptide (AbetaP) are diverse, and include altered enzyme activities, disrupted calcium homeostasis, and increased free radical formation. AbetaP appears to interact at the cell membrane with a multitude of receptor sites and also inserts physically into the membrane matrix. This membrane insertion affects the membrane fluidity and potentially influences the function of resident membrane proteins. We propose a unifying hypothesis to explain the experimental observations of the diverse cellular responses to AbetaP. The indiscriminate physical insertion of AbetaP into the cell membrane unspecifically activates a host of membrane processes by perturbation of the membrane proteins. This recurrent activation of membrane processes eventually culminates in neuronal cell death. We recommend that successful therapeutic interventions should be directed at reducing or preventing the interaction of AbetaP with neuronal cell membranes.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsCell MembraneHumansMembrane FluidityMembrane ProteinsModels, NeurologicalNeuronsNeurotoxinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesMembrane ProteinsNeurotoxins

Identifiers

PMID10591414
OpenAlexW56343202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.