ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999
Stereoselective central nervous system effects of the R- and S-isomers of the GABA uptake blocker N-(4, 4-di-(3-methylthien-2-yl)but-3-enyl) nipecotic acid in the rat.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of amygdala kindling on the central nervous system effects of tiagabine: EEG effects versus brain GABA levels.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The 'effect compartment' model was applied to characterize the pharmacodynamics of the R- and S-isomers of tiagabine in conscious rats in vivo using increase in the beta activity of the EEG as a pharmacodynamic endpoint. 2. No pharmacokinetic differences in plasma were observed between R- and S-tiagabine. The values for clearance and volume of distribution at steady-state were 103+/-10 versus 90+/-6 ml min(-1) kg(-1) and 1.8+/-0.2 versus 1.6+/-0.2 l kg(-1) for the R- and S-isomer, respectively. In contrast, plasma protein binding showed a statistically significant difference with values of the free fraction of 5.7+/-0.5 and 11.4+/-0.6%. In addition the rate constant for transport to the effect compartment was also different with values of 0.027 versus 0.067 min(-1). 3. For both isomers the relationship between concentration and EEG effect was non-linear and successfully characterized on basis of the Hill equation. A statistically significant difference in the value of EC(50) of 328+/-11 versus 604+/-18 ng ml(-1) was observed for R- and S-tiagabine respectively. The values of the other pharmacodynamic parameters were identical. 4. It is concluded that the differences in in vivo pharmacodynamics of R- and S-tiagabine can be explained by stereoselective differences in both the affinity to the GABA-uptake transporter and the degree of non-specific protein binding in plasma and at the effect site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.