Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10585967›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR1999

Retroviral DNA integration.

P Hindmarsh, J Leis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Common Assays in Mammalian Golgi Studies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Contributions of Clinical Pharmacology to HIV Cure Research.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Vector Specificity of Arbovirus Transmission.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P HindmarshDepartment of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
J Leis
Case Western Reserve University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA integration is a unique enzymatic process shared by all retroviruses and retrotransposons. During integration, double-stranded linear viral DNA is inserted into the host genome in a process catalyzed by the virus-encoded integrase (IN). The mechanism involves a series of nucleophilic attacks, the first of which removes the terminal 2 bases from the 3' ends of the long terminal repeats and of the second which inserts the viral DNA into the host genome. IN specifically recognizes the DNA sequences at the termini of the viral DNA, juxtaposing both ends in an enzyme complex that inserts the viral DNA into a single site in a concerted manner. Small duplications of the host DNA, characteristic of the viral IN, are found at the sites of insertion. At least two host proteins, HMG-I(Y) and BAF, have been shown to increase the efficiency of the integration reaction.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralVirus IntegrationAvian Sarcoma VirusesHigh Mobility Group ProteinsHIV-1IntegrasesRetroviridaeDNA, ViralHigh Mobility Group ProteinsIntegrases

Identifiers

PMID10585967
PMCPMC98978
OpenAlexW1958134851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.