Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10585962›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1999

Analysis of competition binding between soluble and membrane-bound ligands for cell surface receptors.

P Li, P Selvaraj, C Zhu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular flexibility can influence the stimulatory ability of receptor-ligand interactions at cell-cell junctions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P LiGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0363, USA.
P Selvaraj
C Zhu
Georgia Institute of Technology · USEmory University · US

Funding

Ligand Binding Kinetics and Cell Adhesion by Fc ReceptorR01AI038282 · NIAID · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZHU, CHENG · 2001 to 2005
$1.9M
Kinetic analysis of ligand binding by TCR and CD8R56AI038282 · NIAID · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZHU, CHENG · 2012 to 2012
$389k
LIGAND BONDING FORCE AND CELL ADHESION BY CD16 ISOFORMSR29AI038282 · NIAID · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZHU, CHENG · 1995 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI38282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding of the Fc portion of IgG coated on targets to Fcgamma receptors (e.g., CD16) expressed on leukocytes (i.e., 2D binding) is an initiating step for immune responses such as phagocytosis or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. In vivo, circulating leukocytes are exposed to plasma IgG. The competition from soluble IgG (i.e., 3D binding) may affect the 2D binding. Many cell surface receptors, CD16 included, have soluble counterparts. While their physiological significance is not clear, receptor-based competitive inhibition therapy, in which soluble receptors, ligands, and their analogs are employed to compete with surface-bound receptors and ligands to prevent unwanted adhesion, is widely used to treat various diseases. To provide a quantitative basis for design of these therapeutic approaches, we developed a mathematical model for 2D and 3D competition binding. The model relates cell-surface adhesion (in the presence and absence of dislodging forces) to the concentration of the soluble competitor, the densities of the surface-bound receptors and ligands, as well as the binding affinities of the 2D and 3D interactions. Binding of CD16-expressing cells to an IgG-coated surface in the presence of a soluble competitor (IgG or anti-CD16 antibody) was quantified by a centrifugation assay. The agreement between experiment and theory supports the validity of the model, which could be useful in predicting the efficacy of the competitor.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCell AdhesionCell MembraneCHO CellsCricetinaeImmunoglobulin GLigandsMiceModels, BiologicalP-SelectinReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, IgGRecombinant ProteinsImmunoglobulin GLigandsP-SelectinReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, IgGRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10585962
PMCPMC1300611
OpenAlexW2062877947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.