Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10585930›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1999

Elasticity of the red cell membrane and its relation to hemolytic disorders: an optical tweezers study.

J Sleep, D Wilson, R Simmons, W Gratzer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Soft matter mechanics of immune cell aggregates.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Non-Invasive Dynamic Reperfusion of MicrovesselsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Deformability of Stored Red Blood Cells.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SleepMRC Unit of Muscle and Cell Motility, Randall Institute, Kings College London, 26-29 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5RL, United Kingdom. john@muscle.rai.kcl.ac.uk
D Wilson
R Simmons
W Gratzer
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have used optical tweezers to study the elasticity of red cell membranes; force was applied to a bead attached to a permeabilized spherical ghost and the force-extension relation was obtained from the response of a second bead bound at a diametrically opposite position. Interruption of the skeletal network by dissociation of spectrin tetramers or extraction of the actin junctions engendered a fourfold reduction in stiffness at low applied force, but only a twofold change at larger extensions. Proteolytic scission of the ankyrin, which links the membrane skeleton to the integral membrane protein, band 3, induced a similar effect. The modified, unlike the native membranes, showed plastic relaxation under a prolonged stretch. Flaccid giant liposomes showed no measurable elasticity. Our observations indicate that the elastic character is at least as much a consequence of the attachment of spectrin as of a continuous membrane-bound network, and they offer a rationale for formation of elliptocytes in genetic conditions associated with membrane-skeletal perturbations. The theory of Parker and Winlove for elastic deformation of axisymmetric shells (accompanying paper) allows us to determine the function BH(2) for the spherical saponin-permeabilized ghost membranes (where B is the bending modulus and H the shear modulus); taking the literature value of 2 x 10(-19) Nm for B, H then emerges as 2 x 10(-6) Nm(-1). This is an order of magnitude higher than the value reported for intact cells from micropipette aspiration. Reasons for the difference are discussed.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsElasticityErythrocyte MembraneHemolysisHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLiposomesMembrane FluidityMembrane ProteinsModels, BiologicalOptics and PhotonicsPhosphorylationStress, MechanicalLiposomesMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10585930
PMCPMC1300579
OpenAlexW2011687418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.