ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
National electronic Library for Health (NeLH)
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Looking Through a Social Lens: Conceptualising Social Aspects of Knowledge Management for Global Health Practitioners.Journal of public health research · 2017Article
- Grand challenges in digital health.Frontiers in public health · 2015Article
- Supporting implementation of evidence-based behavioral interventions: the role of data liquidity in facilitating translational behavioral medicine.Translational behavioral medicine · 2011Article
- A user-centred evaluation framework for the Sealife semantic web browsers.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Community nursing needs more silver surfers: a questionnaire survey of primary care nurses' use of information technology.BMC nursing · 2004Article
- The internet.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2002Review
- Participation of patients in decisions about treatment for cancer.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Review
- Accessing electronic information for clinical decisions.Archives of disease in childhood · 2000Article
- Clinical governance in primary care: knowledge and information for clinical governance.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- The use of quality benchmarking in assessing web resources for the dermatology virtual branch library of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH).Journal of medical Internet researchArticle
- Do clinicians use online evidence to support patient care? A study of 55,000 clinicians.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age.Journal of medical Internet researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.