Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10582869›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1999

Interaction between fluconazole and amphotericin B in mice with systemic infection due to fluconazole-susceptible or -resistant strains of Candida albicans.

A Louie, P Banerjee, G L Drusano, M Shayegani, M H Miller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Vivo Efficacy of Amphotericin B against FourJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  11. Commercial AHAS-inhibiting herbicides are promising drug leads for the treatment of human fungal pathogenic infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2005
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Combination antifungal therapy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2004
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A LouieDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York 12208, USA. arnold_louie_at_amc01-3@ccgateway.amc.edu
P Banerjee
G L Drusano
M Shayegani
M H Miller
Office of Infectious Diseases · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USNew York State Department of Health · USWadsworth Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between fluconazole (Flu) and amphotericin B (AmB) was evaluated in a murine model of systemic candidiasis for one Flu-susceptible strain (MIC, 0.5 microg/ml), two strains with intermediate Flu resistance (Flu mid-resistant strains) (MIC, 64 and 128 microg/ml), and one highly Flu-resistant strain (MIC, 512 microg/ml) of Candida albicans. Differences in fungal densities in kidneys of infected mice after 24 h of therapy and in survival rates at 62 days of mice treated with an antifungal drug or a combination of antifungal drugs for 4 days were compared. For the Flu-susceptible and Flu mid-resistant strains, the combination of Flu and AmB was antagonistic, as shown by both quantitative culture results and survival. The interaction was additive for the highly Flu-resistant strain. These results suggest that the combination of Flu and AmB should be used with caution in infections due to fungi that are usually susceptible to both antifungal agents and as empirical antifungal drug therapy.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveCandida albicansCandidiasisDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleFluconazoleKidneyMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDrug CombinationsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID10582869
PMCPMC89574
OpenAlexW2146800976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.