Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10577910›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1999

Mutation rates in humans. I. Overall and sex-specific rates obtained from a population study of hemophilia B.

P M Green, S Saad, C M Lewis, F Giannelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. The Clinical Genetics of Hemophilia B (Factor IX Deficiency).The application of clinical genetics · 2021
    Review
  4. Recent advances in hemophilia B therapy.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017
    Review
  5. Hemophilia B: molecular pathogenesis and mutation analysis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Permanence or change? The meaning of genetic variation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P M GreenDivision of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Guy's Hospital Tower, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
S Saad
C M Lewis
F Giannelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A population-based study of hemophilia B mutations was conducted in the United Kingdom in order to construct a national confidential database of mutations and pedigrees to be used for the provision of carrier and prenatal diagnoses based on mutation detection. This allowed the direct estimate of overall (micro), male (v), and female (u) mutation rates for hemophilia B. The values obtained per gamete per generation and the 95% confidence intervals are micro;=7.73 (6. 29-9.12&parr0;x10-6; v=18.8 (14.5-22.9&parr0;x10-6; and u=2.18 (1. 44-3.16&parr0;x10-6. The ratio of male-to-female mutation rates is 8. 64, with a 95% confidence interval of 5.46-14.5. The higher male rate was not caused by a much higher rate of transition at CpG sites in the male. Attempts to detect evidence of gonadal mosaicism for hemophilia B mutation in suitable families did not detect any instances of ovarian mosaicism in any of 47 available opportunities. This suggests that the risk of a noncarrier mother manifesting as a gonadal mosaic by transmitting the mutation to a second child should be <0.062.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDatabases, FactualDNA Mutational AnalysisFactor IXFemaleGene FrequencyGonadsHemophilia BHumansLongevityMaleMosaicismMothersMutationPedigreeRegistriesFactor IX

Identifiers

PMID10577910
PMCPMC1288367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.