ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
Routine antenatal HIV testing. Is acceptable to women.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mass media interventions for promoting HIV testing.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- Missed opportunities for participation in prevention of mother to child transmission programmes: simplicity of nevirapine does not necessarily lead to optimal uptake, a qualitative study.AIDS research and therapy · 2007Article
- Mandatory reporting of HIV infection and opt-out prenatal screening for HIV infection: effect on testing rates.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003Article
- Opt in or opt out: what is optimal for prenatal screening for HIV infection?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003Review
- Failure to prevent perinatal HIV infection.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10576853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.