Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10576579›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology1999

Speculation on whether a vaccine against cryptosporidiosis is a reality or fantasy.

D C de Graaf, F Spano, F Petry, S Sagodira, A Bonnin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathophysiology of diarrhea in calves.The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice · 2009
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A review of the importance of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals.International journal for parasitology · 1999
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D C de GraafVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Brussels, Belgium. dideg@var.fgov.be
F Spano
F Petry
S Sagodira
A Bonnin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper the authors question whether the development of a vaccine against cryptosporidiosis could be taken into consideration. The necessity and feasibility of such a vaccine for human and veterinary application is discussed. Developmental stages within the life cycle of the parasite that might act as possible targets for vaccine development are summarised, as well as the target antigens offered by molecular biology and immunology studies. Vaccination trials against cryptosporidiosis carried out so far, including the active and passive immunisation approach, are also overviewed. It seems that with respect to a Cryptosporidium vaccine two target groups can be considered: children of the developing world and neonatal ruminants. Antigens representing possible candidates for a subunit vaccine were identified based on their function, location and/or the immune response they evoke. While the active vaccination of newborn calves, lambs and goat kids has to face a number of important limitations, the passive immunisation approach, where dams were immunised to protect their progeny by colostral transfer, was proven to be a valuable alternative. Finally, a number of points of action for the near future are put forward.

Indexed as

Protozoan VaccinesAnimalsCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium parvumHumansProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID10576579
PMCPMC7130201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.