Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10567569›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1999

Distinct cellular factors regulate the c-myb promoter through its E2F element.

M R Campanero, M Armstrong, E Flemington

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. E2F-1 has dual roles depending on the cell cycle.International journal of biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms involved in Burkitt's tumor formation.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2008
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M R CampaneroHarvard University and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
M Armstrong
E Flemington
Harvard University · US

Funding

EBV BZLF1 GENE PRODUCTR01GM048045 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI FLEMINGTON, ERIK K · 1998 to 2007
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048045NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM48045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most E2F-driven promoters are transiently activated around the G(1)/S transition. Although the promoter for the c-myb proto-oncogene harbors an E2F element, it is induced early in G(1) following entry into the cell cycle. Furthermore, this promoter remains active throughout subsequent cell cycles. Since E2F sites function as repressor elements during G(1) (due to the association of pRb with E2F factors), we investigated whether the E2F element in the c-myb promoter is regulated differently than E2F elements in promoters that are repressed during G(1). By gel shift analysis, the E2F element from the c-myb promoter was found to form a unique complex, referred to as E2Fmyb-sp, which was not observed with E2F elements from several other promoters. Antibodies to DP-1, E2F1 to -5, p107, or pRb failed to either supershift or block E2Fmyb-sp complex formation. Methylation interference experiments indicate that the DNA contact residues for the E2Fmyb-sp complex are distinct from but overlapping with residues required for the binding of E2F proteins. In addition to the identification of E2Fmyb-sp, we have found that SP-1 binds to the c-myb E2F element. Functional studies revealed that E2Fmyb-sp and/or SP-1 are required to achieve full activation of the c-myb promoter in different cell types and to maintain elevated expression of the c-myb promoter during G(1) in NIH 3T3 cells. These studies demonstrate that E2F elements can be regulated differently through the binding of unique sets of proteins.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticPromoter Regions, Genetic3T3 CellsAnimalsBinding SitesE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F Transcription FactorsHumansJurkat CellsMiceProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRetinoblastoma-Binding Protein 1Arid4a protein, mouseCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsE2F1 protein, humanE2f1 protein, mouseE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F Transcription FactorsMAS1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRetinoblastoma-Binding Protein 1Retinoblastoma ProteinTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseTFDP1 protein, humanTfdp1 protein, mouseTranscription Factor DP1Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10567569
PMCPMC84947
OpenAlexW2154741768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.