Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10567566›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1999

Nuclear retention elements of U3 small nucleolar RNA.

W Speckmann, A Narayanan, R Terns, M P Terns

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SnoRNAs: Exploring Their Implication in Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Intron-3 retention/splicing controls neuronal expression of apolipoprotein E in the CNS.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Large-scale isolation of Cajal bodies from HeLa cells.Molecular biology of the cell · 2002
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W SpeckmannDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
A Narayanan
R Terns
M P Terns
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Small RNA-based immunity by CRISPR-Cas complexes of Pyrococcus furiosusR01GM054682 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI TERNS, MICHAEL P, TERNS, REBECCA · 1997 to 2015
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM54682NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processing and methylation of precursor rRNA is mediated by the box C/D small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). These snoRNAs differ from most cellular RNAs in that they are not exported to the cytoplasm. Instead, these RNAs are actively retained in the nucleus where they assemble with proteins into mature small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein particles and are targeted to their intranuclear site of action, the nucleolus. In this study, we have identified the cis-acting sequences responsible for the nuclear retention of U3 box C/D snoRNA by analyzing the nucleocytoplasmic distributions of an extensive panel of U3 RNA variants after injection of the RNAs into Xenopus oocyte nuclei. Our data indicate the importance of two conserved sequence motifs in retaining U3 RNA in the nucleus. The first motif is comprised of the conserved box C' and box D sequences that characterize the box C/D family. The second motif contains conserved box sequences B and C. Either motif is sufficient for nuclear retention, but disruption of both motifs leads to mislocalization of the RNAs to the cytoplasm. Variant RNAs that are not retained also lack 5' cap hypermethylation and fail to associate with fibrillarin. Furthermore, our results indicate that nuclear retention of U3 RNA does not simply reflect its nucleolar localization. A fragment of U3 containing the box B/C motif is not localized to nucleoli but retained in coiled bodies. Thus, nuclear retention and nucleolar localization are distinct processes with differing sequence requirements.

Indexed as

RNA, Small NucleolarAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesCell NucleusChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCytoplasmMethylationMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA CapsTemperatureXenopusChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistonefibrillarinRNARNA CapsRNA, Small NucleolarRNA, U3 small nucleolar

Identifiers

PMID10567566
PMCPMC84939
OpenAlexW2170808152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.