ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999
Comparison of a nonradiometric liquid-medium method (MB REDOX) with the BACTEC system for growth and identification of mycobacteria in clinical specimens.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a liquid medium (M7H9C) for routine culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis to replace modified Bactec 12B medium.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Specificities and functions of the recA and pps1 intein genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and application for diagnosis of tuberculosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of tuberculosis in the clinical setting is of great importance in order for specific therapy to be swiftly initiated. MB REDOX (Heipha Diagnostika), a growth-based medium without radioactive materials, was evaluated and was compared to the BACTEC system for detection of mycobacteria, including the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and atypical mycobacteria. MB REDOX consists of a Kirchner medium enriched with growth-promoting additives, antibiotic compounds, and a redox indicator which can be monitored to detect growth of mycobacteria with the naked eye. MB REDOX only detects growth and cannot differentiate the M. tuberculosis complex (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, and M. africanum) from other species of Mycobacterium. Therefore, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PRA) was used in this investigation to identify to the species level organisms showing positive growth with MB REDOX. Our data demonstrate the usefulness of MB REDOX for the detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens. The rate of detection of M. tuberculosis complex with MB REDOX (84. 3%) was higher than that with the BACTEC system (68.6%). When combined with PRA for species identification, MB REDOX is easy to perform and is suited to most clinical laboratory settings for the detection and identification of mycobacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.