Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10562587›Full record

ArticleGut1999

Comparison of cattle and sheep colonic permeabilities to horseradish peroxidase and hamster scrapie prion protein in vitro.

A T McKie, P S Zammit, R J Naftalin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A T McKieDivision of Biomedical Sciences (Physiology Group), King's College, London, UK.
P S Zammit
R J Naftalin
King's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParacellular permeability to solutes across the descending colon is much higher in cattle than sheep. This is a possible route for transmission of infective materials, such as scrapie prion.

aimsTo compare the permeabilities of labelled scrapie prion protein and other macromolecules in bovine and ovine descending colons in vitro.

methodsUsing fresh slaughterhouse material, transepithelial fluxes of macromolecules across colonic mucosae mounted in Ussing chambers were measured by monitoring transport of either enzyme activity or radioactivity.

resultsThe comparative bovine to ovine permeability ratio of the probes increased with molecular weight: from 3.1 (0.13) for PEG400 to 10.67 (0.20) (p<0.001) for PEG4000; and from 1.64 (0.17) for microperoxidase to 7.03 (0.20) (p<0.001) for horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The permeability of (125)I-labelled inactivated Syrian hamster scrapie prion protein (ShaPrP(sc)) was 7.02 (0.33)-fold higher in bovine than ovine colon (p<0.0025). In each species, the probe permeabilities decreased according to the formula: P = P(o). exp(-K.ra). The "ideal" permeabilities, P(o) are similar, however, K((ovine)) = 2.46 (0.20) cm/h/nm exceeds K((bovine)) = 0.85 (0.15) cm/h/nm (p<0.001) indicating that bovine colon has a higher proportion of wide pores than ovine. Image analysis confirmed that HRP permeated through the bovine mucosal layer via a pericryptal paracellular route much more rapidly than in sheep.

conclusionsThese data may imply that scrapie prion is transmitted in vivo more easily across the low resistance bovine colonic barrier than in other species.

Indexed as

Intestinal AbsorptionAnimalsCattleColonCricetinaeHorseradish PeroxidaseIntestinal MucosaPermeabilityPeroxidasesPolyethylene GlycolsPrionsSheepTemperatureHorseradish PeroxidasemicroperoxidasePeroxidasesPolyethylene GlycolsPrions

Identifiers

PMID10562587
PMCPMC1727738
OpenAlexW2116962641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.