ArticleThe Journal of physiology1999
Nicardipine-sensitive Na+-mediated single channel currents in guinea-pig sinoatrial node pacemaker cells.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell-specific models of hiPSC-CMs developed by the gradient-based parameter optimization method fitting two different action potential waveforms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The importance of Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms for the initiation of the heartbeat.Frontiers in physiology · 2015Review
- A mathematical model of action potentials of mouse sinoatrial node cells with molecular bases.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2011Article
- The sustained inward current and inward rectifier K+ current in pacemaker cells dissociated from rat sinoatrial node.The Journal of physiology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The Na+-dependent inward currents underlying slow diastolic depolarization of sinoatrial (SA) node cells were examined. Using a Na+-rich, Ca2+-free pipette solution a novel single channel current was recorded in addition to the conventional Na+ and L-type Ca2+ currents. The current (termed ist, as it reflects the whole-cell sustained inward current, Ist) does not show obvious inactivation during a 700 ms depolarization and is unique in having a smaller amplitude (1.1 +/- 0.18 pA at -60 mV, n = 12) than the Na+ current through conventional Na+ ( approximately 3.3 pA) and Ca2+ channels (9.6 +/- 0.32 pA at -60 mV, n = 8). The mean unitary conductance of ist channels was 13.3 pS. 2. The recording of ist was infrequent, was observed only in spontaneously beating SA node cells, and was facilitated by adding Bay-K 8644 to the pipette solution. Overlapping of ist events was observed and ist was abolished by bath application of nicardipine. 3. In the ensemble average, the activation of ist was evident by depolarization beyond -70 mV, and the dynamic voltage range of activation (-70 to -30 mV) encompassed the extent of the slow diastolic depolarization. The current density of ist was 0.33 pA pF-1 at -60 mV, as estimated from the number of channels per membrane patch, the open probability and the unitary amplitude. 4. Cumulative histograms for both open and closed times were fitted with a sum of two exponential components. The slow time constants decreased with depolarization, while the fast time constants and the fraction of the fast component were voltage independent. The number of bursts per sweep increased with depolarization. The time constant of the first latency histogram was about two orders of magnitude larger than those in cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels and decreased with depolarization. 5. It is suggested that the ist channels might be responsible for the whole-cell Ist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.