Cybermedicine. Interview by Clare Thompson.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Peer Support for Chronic Pain in Online Health Communities: Quantitative Study on the Dynamics of Social Interactions in a Chronic Pain Forum.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
   Article
2. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information.Cureus · 2022
   Article
3. Why the tremendous potential of uploading health educational material on medical institutions' website remains grossly underutilized in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution?Journal of education and health promotion · 2020
   Review
4. The quality of online information regarding dental implants.British dental journal · 2014
   Article
5. Anamneses-Based Internet Information Supply: Can a Combination of an Expert System and Meta-Search Engine Help Consumers find the Health Information they Require?The open medical informatics journal · 2010
   Article
6. Users and non-users of web-based health advice service among Finnish university students - chronic conditions and self-reported health status (a cross-sectional study).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2008
   Article
7. Assessment of internet use and effects among healthcare professionals: a cross sectional survey.Postgraduate medical journal · 2006
   Article
8. Information and communication technology (ICT) in oncology. Patients' and relatives' experiences and suggestions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2003
   Article
9. Delivering consumer health information digitally: a comparison between the web and touchscreen kiosk.Journal of medical systems · 2003
   Article
10. eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites.Journal of medical Internet research · 2002
    Article
11. The internet.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2002
    Review
12. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
    Review
13. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information.Journal of general internal medicine · 2002
    Article
14. [Evaluation of medical web sites. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of an evaluation tool].Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2001
    Article
15. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres.British journal of cancer · 2001
    Article
16. [Applications of telemedicine in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2001
    Article
17. MedCERTAIN: quality management, certification and rating of health information on the Net.Proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2000
    Article
18. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age.Journal of medical Internet research
    Article
19. Electronic medical consultation: a New Zealand perspective.Journal of medical Internet research
    Article
20. The use of quality benchmarking in assessing web resources for the dermatology virtual branch library of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH).Journal of medical Internet research
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as