ArticleQuality in health care : QHC1999
Improving the repeat prescribing process in a busy general practice. A study using continuous quality improvement methodology.
Article in Quality in health care : QHC, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental health care: Systematic review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.Annals of family medicinePooled it
- Juvenile Probation Officers' Perceptions of Sanctions and Incentives as Compliance Strategies.Journal of applied juvenile justice services · 2022Article
- Repeat prescribing of medications: A system-centred risk management model for primary care organisations.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2017Article
- Early detection of maternal deaths in Senegal through household-based death notification integrating verbal and social autopsy: a community-level case study.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Article
- Using real time process measurements to reduce catheter related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.Quality & safety in health care · 2005Article
- Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.Quality & safety in health care · 2003Article
- The Dorset Seedcorn Project: interprofessional learning and continuous quality improvement in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
- Quality improvement reports: a new kind of article. They should allow authors to describe improvement projects so others can learn.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problemA need to improve service to patients by reducing the time wasted by reception staff so that the 48 hour target for processing repeat prescription requests for patient collection could be achieved.
designAn interprofessional team was established within the practice to tackle the area of repeat prescribing which had been identified as a priority by practice reception staff. The team met four times in three months and used continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodology (including the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle) with the assistance of an external facilitator. BACKGROUND AND
settingA seven partner practice serving the 14,000 patients on the northern outskirts of Bournemouth including a large council estate and a substantial student population from Bournemouth University. The repeat prescribing process is computerised. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Reducing turn around times for repeat prescription requests. Reducing numbers of requests which need medical records to be checked to issue the script. Feedback to staff about the working of the process. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for guidance, the team decided to (a) coincide repeat medications and to record on the computer drugs prescribed during visits; (b) give signing of prescriptions a higher priority and bring them to doctors' desks at an agreed time; and (c) move the site for printing prescriptions to the reception desk so as to facilitate face to face queries. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Prescription turnaround within 48 hours increased from 95% to 99% with reduced variability case to case and at a reduced cost. The number of prescriptions needing records to be looked at was reduced from 18% to 8.6%. This saved at least one working day of receptionist time each month. Feedback from all staff within the practice indicated greatly increased satisfaction with the newly designed process. LESSONS LEARNT: The team's experience suggests that a combination of audit and improvement methodology offers a powerful way to learn about, and improve, practice. The interventions used by the team not only produced measurable and sustainable improvements but also helped the team to learn about the cost of achieving the results and provided them with tools to accomplish the aims. The importance of feedback to all staff about CQI measures was also recognised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.