Cardiac rehabilitation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Randomised trials of secondary prevention programmes in coronary heart disease: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
   Pooled it
2. Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews.BMC health services research · 2007
   Review
3. Psychological consequences of myocardial infarction: a self-regulation perspective on health-related quality of life and cardiac rehabilitation.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2006
   Review
4. Coronary disease. Management of the post-myocardial infarction patient: rehabilitation and cardiac neurosis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2000
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as