Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10556935›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999

Diinosine pentaphosphate (IP5I) is a potent antagonist at recombinant rat P2X1 receptors.

B F King, M Liu, J Pintor, J Gualix, M T Miras-Portugal, G Burnstock

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The P2X1 receptor as a therapeutic target.Purinergic signalling · 2022
    Review
  3. Heteromeric assembly of P2X subunits.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Purinergic modulation of granule cells.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2012
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. P2X3 receptor involvement in pain states.Molecular neurobiology · 2007
    Review
  14. Pharmacology of P2X channels.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2006
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Purine and pyrimidine (P2) receptors as drug targets.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2002
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B F KingAutonomic Neuroscience Institute, Royal Free & University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, Hampstead, London NW3 2PF, UK. b.king@ucl.ac.uk
M Liu
J Pintor
J Gualix
M T Miras-Portugal
G Burnstock
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The antagonist activity of a series of diinosine polyphosphates (IpnI, where n=3, 4, 5) was assessed against ATP-activated inward currents at rat P2X(1-4) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes and studied under voltage-clamp conditions. 2. Diinosine polyphosphates were prepared by the enzymatic degradation of their corresponding diadenosine polyphosphates (e.g., Ap5A into Ip5I) using 5'-adenylic deaminase, and purified using reverse-phase chromatography. 3. Against ATP-responses at rP2X1 receptors, the potency order for antagonism was (pIC50): Ip5I (8.5)>Ip4I (6.3)>Ip3I (>4.5). Ip5I (10-100 nM) caused a concentration-dependent rightwards displacement of the ATP concentration-response curve without reducing the maximum ATP effect. However, the Schild plot was non-linear which indicated Ip5I is not a competitive antagonist. Blockade by micromolar concentrations of Ip5I was not surmountable. Ip4I also behaved as a non-surmountable antagonist. 4. Against ATP-responses at rP2X3 receptors, the potency order for antagonism was (pIC50): Ip4I (6. 0)>Ip5I (5.6)>Ip3I (>4.5). Blockade by Ip4I (pA2, 6.75) and Ip5I (pA2, 6.27) was surmountable at micromolar concentrations. 5. Diinosine polyphosphates failed to inhibit ATP-responses at rP2X2 receptors, whereas agonist responses at rP2X4 were reversibly potentiated by Ip4I and Ip5I. None of the parent diadenosine polyphosphates behave as antagonists at rP2X1 - 4 receptors. 6. Thus, Ip5I acted as a potent and relatively-selective antagonist at the rP2X1 receptor. This dinucleotide pentaphosphate represents a high-affinity antagonist for the P2X1 receptor, at which it acts in a competitive manner at low (</=100 nM) concentrations but has more complex actions at higher (>100 nM) concentrations.

Indexed as

Purinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsAdenosine Deaminase InhibitorsAnimalsAspergillusChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDinucleoside PhosphatesElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyMembrane PotentialsOocytesRatsReceptors, Purinergic P2XRecombinant ProteinsXenopus laevisAdenosine Deaminase Inhibitorsdiinosine pentaphosphateDinucleoside PhosphatesPurinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2XRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10556935
PMCPMC1571720
OpenAlexW2001759023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.