ArticleMedizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)1999
[Anti-angiogenesis: a new approach to tumor therapy?].
Article in Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe overall mortality due to metastatic cancer has not or only minimally been reduced in spite of intensive research and many innovations in the field of conventional antineoplastic therapy in the past decade. In the last years it has become a fact that tumor growth is angiogenesis-dependent. Therefore, inhibitors of angiogenesis are a new class of antineoplastic substances with a novel mechanism of action that might be a powerful complement to conventional cytostatic therapy. SUBSTANCES AND CLINICAL TRIALS: Inhibitors of tumor-angiogenesis which have entered clinical trials, with their results published until December 1998 are discussed here. Most results originate from phase-I or phase-II clinical trials. They are discussed and compared in respect to toxicity and response. Also some substances with high therapeutic potential which are still in preclinical testing are discussed.
resultsMany of the investigated angiogenesis inhibitors demonstrated anti-tumor effects in phase-I or phase-II clinical trials. The commonest manifestation was stable disease, followed by partial remissions. In a few cases, complete remissions were observed. The toxicities of these substances differ both in type and degree of side effects.
conclusionSome antiangiogenic drugs appear to be promising candidates for a clinical use in the therapy of solid tumors. Further conclusions can only be drawn after evaluation of the results of ongoing phase-III clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10554516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.