Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10554050›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1999

Levodopa in Parkinson's disease: neurotoxicity issue laid to rest?

M G Murer, R Raisman-Vozari, O Gershanik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M G MurerDepartamento de Fisiología y Biofísica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. gmurer@fmed.uba.ar
R Raisman-Vozari
O Gershanik
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInserm · FRUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orally administered levodopa remains the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease. The introduction of levodopa therapy is often delayed, however, because of the fear that it might be toxic for the remaining dopaminergic neurons, and thus accelerate the deterioration of the patient's condition. Evidence for levodopa toxicity comes mainly from in vitro studies which have demonstrated that levodopa can damage dopaminergic neurons by a mechanism that probably involves oxidative stress. It is widely accepted, however, that levodopa is not toxic for healthy animals and humans who do not have Parkinson's disease. It has been argued that the lesioned mesostriatal dopaminergic system could be more vulnerable to levodopa-induced toxicity, because the brain extracellular concentrations attained by levodopa are higher when the dopaminergic system is damaged, and remaining dopaminergic neurons experience a process of compensatory hyperactivity. Evidence for in vivo levodopa toxicity in animal models of Parkinson's disease is scarce and contradictory. A comprehensive recent study failed to find any evidence of levodopa toxicity in rats with either moderate or severe lesions of the mesostriatal dopaminergic system. Concerning the hypothesis of toxicity, some recent reports have shown that levodopa can have trophic effects on dopaminergic neurons in vitro, and our own work has shown that long term levodopa therapy promotes recovery of striatal dopaminergic markers in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions. Given that neither epidemiological nor clinical studies have ever provided evidence to support that long term levodopa administration can accelerate the progression of Parkinson's disease, we believe that levodopa therapy should not be delayed on the basis of an unconfirmed hypothesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiparkinson AgentsBrainHumansLevodopaParkinson DiseaseAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID10554050
OpenAlexW2004493990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.